
Listening to this CD is invigorating because it's song after song of really good stuff without any filler and so many of the songs on the disc are just the kind of fun that make you want to sing at the top of your lungs with it. (In the very, very rare case where I'm alone in the car with it, that's exactly what I do.)
The idea inevitably occurs to me: some of those single hits are so good that one wonders if the artist in question didn't spend all their life's allocation of brilliance on a single thing, where other artists spread their talent out. "The candle that burns twice as bright burns half as long." Certainly it's a tempting idea to imagine that this CD is so much more fun than others because so many artists make such a condensed packet of creativity.
But I wonder if that's really fair. If I made a CD that had the one or two single best songs of each of a hundred bands who are definitively not one-hit-wonders, bands with lots of well-known songs and hit albums and lengthy careers, would that disc be just as invigorating or even more?
Someday I am going to make that disc and find out.
2 comments:
In many cases it wasn't the one hit wonder band's fault that they only had one hit. In other cases, they had more than one hit, but nobody remembers them 25 years later.
I've used mp3's for this as well. In a lot of cases the albums are out of print and were never released on CD, and the major hit they had is all you find on compilations. Finding the missing gems is a great thing.
"The idea inevitably occurs to me: some of those single hits are so good that one wonders if the artist in question didn't spend all their life's allocation of brilliance on a single thing"
I think this tends to be true, actually. Lots of artists just get one really good idea in their life and spend their remaining years trying to recreate that moment.
Post a Comment